G.JAYACHANDRAN
Arogya Sophine – Appellant
Versus
Arogyasami – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram dated 30.01.2009 in A.S.No.46 of 2008 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Thirukkovilur dated 21.11.2007 in O.S.No.119 of 2005.)
(The case has been heard through Video Conferencing)
1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. The subject matter of the suit is two items of property morefully described in the 'B' schedule of the plaint. The suit initially filed for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Later, the relief was amended for Declaration, Recovery of Possession and Mense Profits. The Trial Court decreed the suit. On appeal by the first defendant, the same was reversed. Hence, the Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court, which has set aside the judgement and decree passed by the Trial Court and dismissed the suit.
2. The suit laid by the appellant/plaintiff on the premise that she is the daughter of one Chinnappan. Her father and the first defendant Arokiyasami are sons of late Antonymuthu. She purchas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.