SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 50

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Sasi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
G. Rama – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Maithri Mahalingam, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Sreevidhya, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(The case has been heard through video conference)

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the order and decreetal order dated 27.07.2012 passed in M.C.O.P.No.911 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Additional District Court, Poonamallee.)

1. This appeal filed by the claimant seeking enhanced compensation for the injury sustained in the road accident.

2. On 07.02.2007 at about 11.25 a.m., while the appellant was riding his motorcycle bearing Reg.No.TN-01-V-5109 at the Junction of Sathiyamoorthy Road and Kengu Reddy Road, a car bearing Reg.No.TN-01-AB-9285 dashed against the motorcycle. The claimant sustained fractured injury and was treated as out patient at Kilpauk Medical College Hospital and thereafter, took native treatment for the fractured bone. At the time of accident, the claimant was earning Rs.4500/- p.m., as a delivery and purchase boy at Net Avenue Technologies (P) Ltd., Chetpet. Seeking compensation of Rs.6,88,000/- claim petition was filed against the owner of the car and its insurer.

3. The insurance Company filed counter stating that the claim petition is bad for no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top