S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
R. Badrayyan – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Rajendran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: CMP No.13806 of 2017 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1,453 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
CMA SR No.90140 of 2016 is preferred against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.48 of 2011 passed by the Learned I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore dated 31.08.2012 by remanding the matter back after setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Learned II Additional Sub Judge, Coimbatore in O.S.No.606 of 2005 dated 22.12.2010.
Uncondonable delay cannot be condoned in a routine manner. Law of limitation is substantive. Litigations/appeals are expected to be filed within the period of limitation as contemplated under the Statutes. Rule is to follow limitation. Condonation of delay is an exception. Exceptions are to be exercised discreetly, if the reasons furnished are genuine and acceptable. The Courts are vested with the discretion to condone the delay. This does not mean that enormous delay are to be condoned mechanically. Undoubtedly, if the reasons are candid and convincing, then the Courts are empowered to exercise its power of discretion so as to condone the delay. Power of discretion is a doub
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.