SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 106

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.M. Sundresh, S. Ananthi, JJ.
T. Muthukumaravel – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal and Water Supply Administration, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.A.(MD)Nos. 313 & 314 of 2018
Decided On : 05-01-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :J. Ashok, Advocate.
For the Respondent: J. Padmavathi Devi, Special Government Pleader, R. Murali, Shaji Bino, N.S.Karthikeyan.

The educational qualification for the post of Junior Assistant is different from the post of Panchayat Secretary/Panchayat Assistant, and the absorbed employees are required to do different work after the absorption.

Headnote:

Panchayat Secretaries - Absorption into Municipal Corporations - G.O.Ms.No.154 Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MC.5) Department, dated 05.12.2014 - The court held that the educational qualification for the post of Junior Assistant is different from the post of Panchayat Secretary/Panchayat Assistant. The absorbed employees are required to do different work after the absorption. The Government Order imposed certain conditions before making the absorbed employees eligible for certain posts and promotion.

Fact of the Case:

The Writ Appeals challenged the Government Order facilitating the absorption of Panchayat Secretaries of the local bodies with the Municipal Corporations and the designation fixed for them.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the absorbed employees are required to do different work after the absorption and upheld the Government Order imposing conditions before making the absorbed employees eligible for certain posts and promotion.

Issues: The issues involved the denial of posts held by the appellants, violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and the regularisation of similarly placed persons as Revenue Assistants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the educational qualification for the post of Junior Assistant is different from the post of Panchayat Secretary/Panchayat Assistant, and the absorbed employees are required to do different work after the absorption. The Government Order imposing conditions was upheld.

Final Decision: The Writ Appeals were disposed of, confirming the order of the learned Single Judge, with the above observations. No costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT :

M.M. Sundresh, J.

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order dated 11.01.2018, made in W.P.(MD)No.20268 of 2014.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order dated 11.01.2018, made in W.P.(MD)No.21079 of 2014.)

1. These Writ Appeals have been filed by the appellants, challenging the Government Order passed, facilitating the absorption of the Panchayat Secretaries of the local bodies with the Municipal Corporations. Resultantly, designation has been fixed for them. The aforesaid Government Order passed imposing certain conditions in G.O.Ms.No.154 Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MC.5) Department, dated 05.12.2014, was put to challenge. The sum and substance of the arguments of the Writ Petitioners before the learned Single Judge was to the effect that they should be allowed to carry forward their posts, they were holding prior to the absorption. Incidentally, it has been argued that in one similar absorption pertaining to Tirunelveli Corporation, the posts held were allowed to be continued even after absorption. The learned Single Judge dealt with the contentions raised by the Writ Petitioners and has given the following findings:

“11. I find merits in the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. Firstly, the post of Panchayat Assistant/Panchayat Secretary is not equivalent to the post of Junior Assistant. Secondly, the recruitment for the post of Junior Assistant is being done by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. Thirdly, the educational qualification for the post of Junior Assistant is quite different from the educational qualification for the post of Panchayat Secretary/Panchayat Assistant. Therefore, when the mode of recruitment and the educational qualification for these two posts are not commensurate with the rules specified in the Tamil Nadu Municipal Corporation Subordinate Service Rules, a policy decision was taken by the Government to absorb them as Record Clerks based on their educational qualification in the impugned G.O.Ms.No.154 dated 5.12.2014 with the following four conditions,

“(a) For absorbing the 35 Panchayat Secretaries, 35 Body Constituted posts may be created in the same scale of pay now they are drawing with pay protection.

(b) The above posts will exist till the existing incumbent continues in this post. Consequent on their retirement, promotion, death and transfer to other posts, this post will lapse automatically.

(c) In order to get training on the establishment related matters of the Madurai, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruppur, Erode, Vellore and Thoothukudi Corporations, they may be given training in the Record Rooms at least for a period of 3 years.

(d) After completion of 3 years training, they may be considered for promotion and appointment as Record Clerks based on their Education Qualifications.”

which cannot be found fault with.

12. Fourthly, the contention made by the petitioners that when the Government had merged the village panchayats into respective Municipal Corporations, the employees serving in the village panchayats should also be absorbed as employees of the respective Municipal Corporations, has not been denied by the respondents, because, while merging the village panchayats into Municipal Corporations, all the employees working in the village panchayats were also absorbed as the employees of the Municipal Corporations. While doing so, taking note of the factor that the petitioners were not appointed in the time scale of pay at the time of appointment and they were all paid with monthly remuneration, they were brought into the time scale of pay in G.O.Ms.No.175, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department dated 5.12.2006 at Rs. 625-10-725-30-925 from 1.9.2006. Again, one another G.O.Ms.No.52, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department dated 29.8.2011 was also issued re-designating the Panchayat Assistant post as Panchayat Secretary by revising the time s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top