SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 129

G.JAYACHANDRAN
M. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkatesan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : A. Saloni, V. Venkatesan.
For the Respondent: C. Bhuvanasundar.

JUDGMENT :

G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P. No. 221 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, V Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

This case has been heard through Video Conferencing.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the second respondent Insurance Company.

2. The appeal is filed by the claimant for enhancement of compensation, being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

3. The facts of the case is that on 07.10.2012 at about 07.15 p.m. while the petitioner was crossing Thiruporur Road near Pillaiyarkovil, rider of a two wheeler without any registration number, being a new vehicle dashed against the appellant causing fracture injury. The appellant was taken to the hospital and treated for his fracture proximal tibia right side and lacerated injuries over the body. The claim petition was filed for a sum of Rs. 6,00,000/- alleging that the claimant wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top