SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1913

R.SUBBIAH, C.SARAVANAN
Vivek Thambuswamy – Appellant
Versus
Maria @ Sijo Paul – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Sheila Jeyaprakash, Advocate
For the Respondent:M.G. Rajeswari, L. Rajasekar, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(C.M.A. No. 620 of 2018:- Appeal filed under Section 19 of The Family Courts Act, 1984 against the Order dated 30.11.2017 passed in OP No. 4382 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai

Crl.R.C. No. 254 of 2019:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Order dated 21.06.2018 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2014 on the file of V Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai setting aside the order dated 29.11.2013 in C.C. No. 298 of 2013 on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate No.II, Egmore.)

Common Judgment:

R. Subbiah, J

1. The aforesaid Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as well as Criminal Revision Case were heard by us through Video-conferencing.

2. C.M.A.No.620 of 2018 has been filed by the appellant/husband, against the order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the learned III Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, dismissing the O.P.No.4382 of 2012 filed by him under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act (as amended) to dissolve the marriage solemnised between him and the respondent herein on 06.02.2012.

3. The respondent/wife in C.M.A.No.620 of 2018 had earlier filed C.C.No.298 of 2013 on the file of Met

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top