SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 185

T.RAVINDRAN
Kandasamy Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Mariyaprakasam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Sounthar, Advocate
For the Respondents:T. Sezhian, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of Subordinate Judge Court, Kallakurichi dated 15.07.2008 in A.S.No.21 of 2005 confirming the judgment and decree of Additional District Munsif-II, Kallakurichi in O.S.No.976 of 2000 dated 24.11.2004).

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2008 passed in A.S.No.21 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.976 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court -II, Kallakurichi.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial court.

3. The defendant in O.S.No.976 of 2000 is the appellant in this second appeal.

4. Suit for permanent injunction.

5. The case of the plaintiffs in brief is that the suit properties are the ancestral properties of their father Anthoni Muthu and the same had been allotted to Anthoni Muthu by way of a partition and a joint patta had also been issued by the Tahsildar on 09.07.1994 in favour of Anthoni Muthu and by way of a registered partition deed dated 17.04.2000 entered into bet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top