SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 233

T.RAVINDRAN
Subramanian, Rep. by Power Agent Dr. Veeran – Appellant
Versus
Ramachandran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :N. Suresh, Advocate
For the Respondent:G. Sumitra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2008 in A.S. No.55 of 2007 on the file of the III-rd Additional District Judge, Puducherry, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 28.11.2007 in O.S.No.20 0f 2006 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Puducherry).

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2008 passed in A.S. No.55 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 28.11.2007 passed in O.S.No.20 0f 2006 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Puducherry.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial court.

3. The plaintiff in OS.No.20 of 2006 is the appellant in the Second Appeal.

4. Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.

5. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that the suit property belonged to Seshachalam and his brother Lakshmanasamy and after their demise, the suit property was enjoyed by one Mohanambal, who was the daughter of Seshachalam and she is the sole legal heir and Mohanambal sold the suit property to o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top