SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 285

R.N.MANJULA
V. Nagammal – Appellant
Versus
Palanisamy @ Kannaraisu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :C.R. Prasanan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel, J. Ramakrishnan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgement and Decree dated 30.12.2009 in A.S.No.123 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Judge's Court, Coimbatore, modifying the judgement and the decree dated 24.04.2008 in O.S.No.423 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.)

1. This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgement and Decree dated 30.12.2009 in A.S.No.123 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Judge's Court, Coimbatore, modifying the judgement and the decree dated 24.04.2008 in O.S.No.423 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and set aside the same.

2. Plaintiffs and defendant are the sisters and brother. The suit property is a self-acquired property of their father. He executed his last Will on 30.11.1981. As per the Will, he bequeathed life estate to his wife and vested remainders to his children (who are plaintiffs and defendant herein). The plaintiffs' mother Ramathal predeceased their father. The father also died on 30.06.1999. Subsequent to the death of their father, the Will came into effect and plaintiffs and defendant have inherited the same

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top