SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 302

R.N.MANJULA
Balasubramaniam – Appellant
Versus
Ponnusamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :P. Valliappan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Manokaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

(Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree of the Subordinate Judge’s Court at Tiruchengode dated 24.07.2009 in A.S.No.185 of 2008, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode dated 31.03.2008 in O.S.No.97 of 1998.)

1. This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 24.07.2009 passed in A.S.No.185 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge’s Court at Tiruchengode, confirming the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2008 passed in O.S.No.97 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode.

2. The Appellant is the plaintiff in the suit.

The short facts of the plaintiff’s case are as under:-

3. The plaintiff is in enjoyment of the lands in village Natham old Survey No.22/3A1 corresponding to new Survey No.500/6 comprising an extent of 0.0375.0 sq.mt. In Illupuli Panchayat, he has constructed a tiled house bearing Door No.9/60. The land in old S.No.22/3A1 corresponding to the new S.No.500/7 in an extent of 0.0210.0 sq.mt was in enjoyment of one Chinnaiya Pillai and Thiyagarajan. Patta is also granted in the favour of them. On 27.11.1995, Chinnaiya Pillai and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top