SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 303

T.RAVINDRAN
S. Sonachalam – Appellant
Versus
R. Kamaraj – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :J. Rama Krishnan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V. Sekar, S. Kalyanaraman, P. Dinesh Kumar, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem dated 24.11.2006 made in A.S.No.138 of 2006 confirming the judgment ad decree of the learned I Additional District Munsif of Salem dated 01.08.2005 made in O.S.No.1816 of 2004.)

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2006 passed in A.S.No.138 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2005 passed in O.S.No.1816 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial court.

3. The second defendant in O.S.No.1816 of 2004 is the appellant in this second appeal.

4. Suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

5. The case of the plaintiffs in brief is that the plaintiffs are entitled to the suit properties by virtue of the partition deed dated 06.03.1986 whereunder, the plaintiffs had been allotted the B and C schedule respectively and the patta also stands in the name of the plaintiffs independently and the plaintiffs are enjo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top