SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 309

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Palanivel – Appellant
Versus
Karuppannan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :P. Jagadeesan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: No Appearance.

JUDGMENT :-

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Order 43, Rule 1(u) r/w Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 03.04.2019 passed by the learned II Additional Sub Judge, Salem in A.S.No.67 of 2017, allowing the judgment and decree dated 29.02.2016 passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Salem in O.S.No.2062 of 2004.)

1. The judgment and decree dated 03.04.2019 passed by the learned II Additional Sub Judge, Salem in A.S.No.67 of 2017, is under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. The plaintiffs are the appellants, defendants are the respondents and the suit was instituted for declaration and other reliefs.

3. The suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiffs and the defendants filed A.S.No.67 of 2017.

4. The First Appellate Court elaborately considered the facts and circumstances as well as the findings of the Trial Court and finally delivered the judgment, remanding the matter back for framing additional issues. Thus, the appellants are constrained to file the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the remand order was passed, directing the Trial Court to frame

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top