R.HEMALATHA
L. N. Nithyanantham – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :-
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the second respondent police and their subordinates not to harass the petitioner for the purpose of enforcing the pre-drafted compromise deed dated 02.06.2020.)
1. The case of the petitioner in nutshell.
The petitioner's father borrowed money from the third respondent Dr.S.Ramadoss during 2014 to meet his family and business expenses. Subsequently, he died of cancer in the year 2016. The petitioner also borrowed money from the third respondent to meet his business and family expenses. Whileso, the third respondent lodged a false complaint with the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai stating that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.1,50,00,000/- from the third respondent promising the latter that he would secure a job for his daughter-in-law. Based on this complaint, the second respondent called the petitioner to her office on 02.06.2020 for an enquiry and harassed him. He was also threatened by the second respondent with dire consequences and the entire episode was video graphed on the latter's (second respondent) instructions. The petitioner was also
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.