Anish vs State, Represented by, Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 314

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, G.ILANGOVAN
Anish – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by, Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari – Respondent

Appearing Advocates:
For the Appellant :R. Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel, K. Prabhu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: R. Anandha Raj, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :-

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, call for records from the Lower Court and to duly set aside the judgment passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil in S.C.No.172 of 2017 dated 05.07.2018.)

G. Ilangovan, J.

1. This appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil in S.C.No.172 of 2017, dated 05.07.2018.

2. The Appellant is arrayed as first accused in S.C.No.172 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil, dated 05.07.2018. He has been convicted for the offence u/s. 302 IPC and sentenced as follows:

Accused	Offence	Sentence
A	(i) 302 IPC	Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- indefault to undergo 6 months Rigorous Imprisonment

3. Assailing the conviction and sentence, he has come up with this appeal.

4. The case of the prosecution:

i) The deceased is the husband of P.W.1, the father of P.W.3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 314

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, G.ILANGOVANAnish – AppellantVersusState, Represented by, Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, G.ILANGOVAN
Anish – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by, Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari – Respondent