SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 368

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Daniya – Appellant
Versus
V. Priya Darshini – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K.A. Ravindran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M/s. Anissa Chaudhary, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, against the order and decree made in G.W.O.P.No.13 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, Vellore District, dated 07.10.2020.

1. The order and decree dated 07.10.2020 passed in G.W.O.P.No.13 of 2017 is under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. The appellant, who is the Paternal grandmother of the minor children namely V.Sairaghu and V.Swathi, filed a petition under Section 6 of the Guardian and Wards Act, seeking custody of the minor children on the ground that the mother lost her right to maintain the minor children, in view of her behavior.

3. It is pertinent to note that Ex.P10/document signed by the father of the minor children, who is the natural guardian, authorizing his mother/appellant to file a petition. Such a power has been granted to the Paternal grandmother of the minor children, in view of the fact that the father of the children is working in CRPF and now posted in Jammu and Kashmir, more specifically in Kupwara District. Pursuant to the power/Ex.P10 granted by the father of the minor children, the Paternal grand mother of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top