SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 381

S.ANANTHI
Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
Shanmuga Vadivu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sheik Nasurdeen, J. Lawrance, Advocates.
For the Respondents:S. Anwar Samean, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records and set aside the order dated 14.03.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.221 of 2015 in M.C. No.39 of 2008 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul and allow the above Revision Petition.

1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the revision petitioner to set aside order, dated 14.03.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.221 of 2015 in M.C. No. 39 of 2008 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul.

2. The revision petitioner herein is husband of the first respondent and father of the second and third respondents. The brief fact of the case is that the marriage between the petitioner and the first respondent was solemnized at Silvarpatti, Dindigul Taluk on 01.06.2001. Due to the wedlock, they blessed with the second and third respondents. After marriage, the revision petitioner unnecessarily picked up quarrel with the first respondent. The respondent/wife harassed, tortured by the petitioner/husband by demanding huge dowry. The respondent/wife was driven out from the matrimonial home and living with her parents. In the meantime, the respondent/wife has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top