SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 387

R.N.MANJULA
Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Dept. , Erode – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Manradiyar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :N. Manikandan, Government Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sai Prasad for M/s. Sai Raaj Associates, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 23.05.2008 made in A.S.No.18 of 2006 on the file of the Fast Track Court No.3, Dharapuram (Additional District and Sessions Court) insofar as confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 22.09.2004 made in O.S.No.97 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Kangeyam and praying to set aside the same.

(Heard through Video Conferencing)

1. This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 23.05.2008 passed in A.S.No.18 of 2006 on the file of the Fast Track Court No.3, Dharapuram (Additional District and Sessions Court) insofar as confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 22.09.2004 passed in O.S.No.97 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Kangeyam and praying to set aside the same.

2. The Appellants are the defendants.

3. The plaintiff and his forefathers have been worshiping Shandiga Devi Amman idol kept inside a small room of their palace. It is the favorite deity of the plaintiff and his forefathers. For more than 200 years, the idol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top