SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 388

P.RAJAMANICKAM
Aroquiadasse – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmanan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Ajayakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decretal order in I.A.No.632 of 2013 in MACTOP.No.1144 of 2007 dated 17.04.2014 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/legal representative of the deceased petitioner Navaraj against the dismissal of his application in I.A.No.632 of 2013 in MACTOP.No.1144 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry dated 17.04.2014.

2. The petitioner herein had filed an application in I.A.No.632 of 2013 in MACTOP.No.1144 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry, under Rules 237 (8) & (9) of Pondicherry Motor Vehicle Rules 1989, to pass an order to permit him to withdraw the award amount of Rs.2,80,538/- with accrued interest. The learned III Additional District Judge, Puducherry, by the order dated 17.04.2014, had dismissed the said application. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner therein had filed the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. Heard Mr.V.Ajayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the seco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top