SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 411

R.SUBBIAH, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
V. Ambiga – Appellant
Versus
K. Dhananjayan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Suryanarayanan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J.

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 06.11.2019 made in M.C.O.P. No. 369 of 2018 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai (Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes at Chennai))

1. Not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai, in and by award dated 06.11.2019 made in MCOP No. 369 of 2018, the present appeal has been filed by the appellants, who are the claimants before the Tribunal, for enhancement of compensation amount.

2. The appellants/claimants are the parents of the deceased V. Jayanthan. It is the case of the appellants/claimants before the Tribunal that on 12.12.2017, at about 18.45 hours, the deceased was riding the motor cycle bearing Registration No. TN 02 AU 1478 to K.G. Signature, Service Road, East Side By-pass Road, Nolambur, Chennai - 600 095. At that time, the car owned by the first respondent herein bearing Registration No. TN 13 A 4183 came from the opposite direction, driven by its driv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top