SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 413

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
R. Vijaya Shankar – Appellant
Versus
R. Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :A.N. Viswanatha Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Sivakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decretal order dated 20.12.2010 in MCOP.No.1943 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/II Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.)

(This case has been heard through video conference)

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed challenging the fair and decretal order dated 20.12.2010 passed in MCOP.No.1943 of 2006 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/II Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2. The case in brief is as follows:

On 15.11.2005, the Petitioner/Appellant herein was riding the motorcycle bearing Reg.No.TN-22-S-8114 at Kamarajar Salai, Chennai and proceeding from North to south direction. At that time, a Qualis Car bearing Reg.No.TN-1-J-1085 proceeding from east to west direction, driven in a rash and negligent manner, hit the petitioner’s/appellant’s vehicle, as a result of which, he sustained grievous injuries all over the body. The first respondent is the owner and the second respondent is the insurer of the car and both

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top