SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 419

A.A.NAKKIRAN
Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
Vijayakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Manokaran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:P. Tamilvel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.08.2015 made in IA.No.836 of 2015 in IA.No.583 of 2010 in OS.No.193 of 2008, by the District Munsif Court, Avinashi.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.08.2015 made in IA.No.836 of 2015 in IA.No.583 of 2010 in OS.No.193 of 2008, by the District Munsif Court, Avinashi.

2. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the 1st Defendant is the Petitioner and the Respondents 1 to 3 are the Plaintiff and the Defendants 2 and 3 respectively. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession. The Plaintiff has filed IA.No.583 of 2010 for subjecting himself and the 1st Defendant to DNA test and the said application was closed on 22.10.2010, observing that after completion of the evidence on both sides, if it is not able to be established that the Plaintiff is not the son of the 1st Defendant, appropriate orders would be passed for paternity test in the said IA. The Plaintiff has filed the petition to reopen IA.No.583 of 2010 and pass necessary orders and the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top