SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
A. Jayaveeran - Petitioner
Versus
The Member Secretary, Pondicherry Institute of Post Matric Technical Education, (PIPMATE) (Sponsored by the Government of Puducherry), Rep. by Union of India & Another – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4692 of 2010 & M.P. Nos. 2 & 3 of 2010
Decided On : 06-01-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Rajeni Ramadas, Advocate.
For the Respondent:T.M. Naveen, T.P. Manoharan, V. Ajayakumar, Advocates.

The possession of prescribed educational qualification as of the cut-off date specified in the notification, the validity of relaxation of conditions, and the entitlement of candidates to be considered under specific categories are crucial legal principles established in the judgment.

Headnote:

Educational Qualification - Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering - [Article 226, Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus] - [Notification dated 18.12.2008] - [B.Tech., M.Tech., SC quota, last date for receipt of application, relaxation of conditions, SC status, direct recruitment, promotional avenue]

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner challenges the provisional selection of the second Respondent for the post of Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering under the SC quota, citing that the second Respondent did not possess the requisite educational qualification by the prescribed date. The Petitioner had the necessary qualifications and was listed as the reserve candidate in the impugned Notification.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the second Respondent did not possess the prescribed educational qualification as of the cut-off date, and the relaxation of the prescribed requirement by the general body was arbitrary and invalid. The court also affirmed the SC status of the Petitioner and directed the Petitioner's selection as a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering by way of direct recruitment.

Issues: The key issues revolved around the possession of the prescribed educational qualification by the candidates, the validity of relaxation of conditions by the general body, and the entitlement of the Petitioner to be considered under the SC category.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that candidates must possess the prescribed educational qualification as of the cut-off date specified in the notification, and any relaxation of conditions should be explicitly provided for in the notification. The court also affirmed the responsibility of the first Respondent to verify the SC status of candidates and the entitlement of the Petitioner to be considered under the SC category.

Final Decision: The impugned notification was quashed as regards the provisional selection of the second Respondent, and the Petitioner was entitled to be selected as a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering by way of direct recruitment. The court also allowed for the filling-up of any remaining vacancy through the promotion of in-service candidates in accordance with applicable rules.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Notification dated NIL of the First Respondent and quash the same to the extent of recommendation of the provisional appointment of the second Respondent to the post of Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering and to consider the Petitioner for the said post.)

1. The notification dated 18.12.2008 (the Notification) of the first Respondent communicating the provisional selection of the second Respondent for the post of Lecturer is challenged by the Petitioner in this writ petition.

2. The Petitioner completed the B.Tech. (Mechanical Engineering) degree from Pondicherry Engineering College in May 2000 and M.Tech. (Energy Technology) degree from the aforesaid college in June 2004. He was working as a Lecturer for about three years in S.K.P. Engineering College and belongs to the Scheduled Caste (SC). Applications were called for from eligible candidates by the first Respondent for appointment to the post of Lecturer in the Polytechnic Colleges functioning under the Pondicherry Institute of Post Matric Technical Education (PIPMATE) at Puducherry, Karaikal, Yanam and Mahe through the Notification. Out of the posts for which the Notification was issued, one post was reserved under the SC quota for a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering. The educational qualification prescribed for the said post is a first class bachelor’s degree in the appropriate branch of engineering/technology.

3. The Petitioner’s name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange, Puducherry and the same was communicated by the first Respondent through memorandum dated 30.01.2009. On that basis, the Petitioner applied for the said post and participated in the written competitive examination, which was conducted on 13.12.2009. Subsequently, he was called for document verification and a personal interview and he attended the same on 01.02.2010 and 02.02.2010 respectively. Pursuant to the above-mentioned selection process, the first Respondent issued the impugned Notification which was published on the internet on 22.02.2010. By the Notification, the list of candidates who were provisionally selected for the post of Lecturer in various disciplines was communicated. Upon perusal thereof, the Petitioner found his name in the reserve list whereas the second Respondent was provisionally selected. Upon further verification, the Petitioner discovered that the second Respondent did not possess the requisite educational qualification of a bachelor’s degree in engineering as of the prescribed date. The case of the Petitioner is that the second Respondent completed his B.E. degree only after the last date prescribed in the Notification. Therefore, the Petitioner filed the present writ petition to challenge the Notification whereby the second Respondent was provisionally selected for the post of Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering under the SC quota.

4. By an interim order dated 08.03.2010, an interim stay was granted as regards the aforesaid post which remains in force as on date.

5. I heard Ms.Rajeni Ramadass, the learned counsel for the Petitioner; Mr.T.M.Naveen, the learned counsel for the first Respondent; and Mr.V.Ajayakumar, the learned counsel for the second Respondent.

6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the Petitioner possessed the prescribed educational qualifications. In support thereof, she referred to the B.Tech. (Mechanical Engineering) degree certificate issued on 29.03.2001 by the Pondicherry University and the M.Tech. (Energy Technology) degree certificate dated 21.01.2006 of the Pondicherry University. In this connection, she also referred to the notification dated 18.02.2008 inviting applications for the post of Lecturer and pointed out that the said notification specified the last date for receipt of the filled-up application with testimonials as 5.00 p.m. on 12.01.2009. As regards t

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top