SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 432

D.KRISHNAKUMAR
M. Jeevitha – Appellant
Versus
S. Valarmathi – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M. Sivakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M. Krishnamoorthy, R. Sreevidhya, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2010 made in M.C.O.P.No.24 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Addl. District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Vellore.)

1. The wife, parents, and minor son who are the dependents of the deceased Manikandan have filed the claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.24 of 2006 before the Tribunal claiming compensation of Rs.6,50,000/- for the death of Manikandan in a road accident.

2. On 12.11.2004 at 11.00 p.m., the deceased Manikandan, husband of the first appellant/claimant met with an accident while he was riding two-wheeler Bajaj Kawasaki bearing registration No. TN 23 R 8491 in Ambur to Pernambut road next to Chinnavarikkam Village, a lorry bearing registration No. TN 23P 8438 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, hit the two wheeler and caused grievous injuries to Manikandan all over his body and he was taken to Government hospital, Ambur for treatment where it was informed that Manikandan died on the way to hospital. A case in Cr.No.638 of 2004 was registered under Sec. 304(A) of I.P.C. by Umabarath police station. The de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top