SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 442

T.RAJA, G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
P. Kamatchi – Appellant
Versus
R. Parthipan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Kannadasan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A. Lakmi Raj Rathinam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

G. Chandrasekharan, J.

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act against the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2016 passed in HMOP No.2940 of 2010 by the learned Principal Family Court Judge at Chennai.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order of the learned Principal Family Court Judge, Chennai in HMOP No.2940 of 2010.

2. The respondent, as the petitioner, filed HMOP No.2940 of 2010 under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for dissolution of the marriage held on 12.07.2000 between the respondent and appellant on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. A male child R.P.Rengarajan was born out of this wedlock. The appellant was a pampered child at her parental home and therefore, she behaved in an authoritative manner with the respondent and his relatives. She was not doing any household work including the cooking. She did not give any respect to respondent’s mother and abused her in filthy language. Inspite of arranging a separate kitchen for the appellant, she used to abuse the respondent’s mother and threatened to kill her and during 2005, she left the matrimonial home and stayed with he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top