SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 455

S.ANANTHI
Amanullah – Appellant
Versus
P. Prabakaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Saravanan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to the Judgment passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dindigul in C.A. No.36 of 2013 dated 17.12.2015 in confirming the Judgment and sentence imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Palani in STC No. 1 of 2013 dated 18.04.2013 and set aside the same and acquit the revision petitioner.)

1. This criminal revision case is filed as against the concurrent findings on a complaint instituted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The trial Court, namely, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Palani, found this petitioner guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.T.C. No.1 of 2013 and by order dated 18.04.2013, convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and compensation of Rs.2 Lakhs in default, to undergo further period of simple imprisonment of One month. As against the conviction and sentence, the petitioner has preferred an appeal and the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Dindigul, by order dated 17.12.20215, in C.A.No.36 of 2013 conf

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top