SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 534

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Balaji, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

This application has been filed taking advantage of Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to reject the plaint as been barred by law.

2. The plaintiff had instituted the present suit seeking a direction against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.3,88,69,185/- (Rupees Three Crores Eighty Eight Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand One Hundred and Eighty Five only) as damages for wrongful occupation of the property belonging to the plaintiff and also a sum of Rs.1,08,30,815/- (Rupees One Crore Eight Lakhs Thirty Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifteen only) towards damages for mental agony suffered by the plaintiff owing to the wrongful occupation of the said property and for costs.

3. Heard Mr.O.R.Santhanakrishnan, learned counsel for the applicant / defendant and Mr.A.K.Balaji, learned counsel for the respondent / plaintiff.

4. A brief glance into the background facts reveal that the plaintiff herein was the landlord and the defendant was the lessee who had been given the benefit of running a petrol bunk litigations arose. The litigations went up to the doors of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and by an Order dated 04.03.2016, in S.L.P.(Civil) No.5619 of 2016, the Hon'ble Supre

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top