C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This application has been filed taking advantage of Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to reject the plaint as been barred by law.
2. The plaintiff had instituted the present suit seeking a direction against the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.3,88,69,185/- (Rupees Three Crores Eighty Eight Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand One Hundred and Eighty Five only) as damages for wrongful occupation of the property belonging to the plaintiff and also a sum of Rs.1,08,30,815/- (Rupees One Crore Eight Lakhs Thirty Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifteen only) towards damages for mental agony suffered by the plaintiff owing to the wrongful occupation of the said property and for costs.
3. Heard Mr.O.R.Santhanakrishnan, learned counsel for the applicant / defendant and Mr.A.K.Balaji, learned counsel for the respondent / plaintiff.
4. A brief glance into the background facts reveal that the plaintiff herein was the landlord and the defendant was the lessee who had been given the benefit of running a petrol bunk litigations arose. The litigations went up to the doors of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and by an Order dated 04.03.2016, in S.L.P.(Civil) No.5619 of 2016, the Hon'ble Supre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.