SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 606

R.SUBBIAH, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Senthil Kumar (died) – Appellant
Versus
Jothivel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :S. Kaithamalai Kumaran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Sree Vidhya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J.

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.184 of 2015 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Ariyalur.

1. These appeals are heard through Video Conferencing.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arraigned before the Tribunal as Insurance Company and claimants.

3. Not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, in and by its judgment dated 12.09.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.184 of 2015 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Ariyalur, claimants have filed C.M.A.No.3913 of 2019. Questioning the liability fastened on the Insurance Company to pay compensation, the Insurance Company had filed C.M.A.No.4575 of 2019.

4. Since both appeals arise out of one and the same judgment, they are disposed of by this common judgment.

5. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

    Claimants are the wife, minor childr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top