SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 614

K.MURALI SHANKAR
P. Soundar – Appellant
Versus
K. Selvi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Senthil kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A.K. Manickam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., against the orders passed by the Family Court, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District in M.C.No.7 of 2017, dated 15.03.2017.

1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in M.C. No. 7 of 2017, dated 15.03.2017 on the file of the Family Court, Thirunelveli.

2. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the revision petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 01.05.2015 at Arulmigu Salaikumarasamy Temple, Thirunelveli, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and that subsequently, there arose misunderstanding between them and they are living separately. It is also not in dispute that the revision petitioner has filed a petition in HMOP.No.273 of 2016 for divorce and that after enquiry the said petition was ordered to be dismissed. The respondent, by invoking Section 125 Cr. P.C., has filed a case in M.C.No.7 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court, Thirunelveli claiming maintenance at Rs.15,000/- per month. The revision petitioner has filed a counter statement disputing the claim of the respondent and prayed for dismissal of the same. The learned Judge of the Family Court, upon considering the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top