SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 647

K.MURALI SHANKAR
K. Manickavel – Appellant
Versus
Jemima Persis – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.M. Vijayakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S. Vinayagam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the judgment in M.C.No.152 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, dated 01.12.2016 and set aside the same.

1. The Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in M.C.No.152 of 2014, dated 01.12.2016, on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the revision petitioner and the first respondent was solemnized on 06.03.1991, at BHEL Marriage Hall, Thiruvarambur, Trichirappali, as per the Christian rites and custom, that due to their wed-lock, a son, namely, Nithiyanandam was born on 05.12.1991 and a daughter by name, Evangeline /the second respondent was born on 07.10.1997, that subsequently there arose misunderstanding between them and that they are living separately.

3. The first respondent for herself and for her minor daughter, by invoking Section 125 of Cr.P.C has filed the case in M.C.No.152 of 2014, claiming monthly maintenance at Rs.10,000/- for her and Rs.10,000/- for her minor daughter, totalling at Rs.20,000/-.

4. The revision petitioner has filed the counter stateme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top