SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 668

T.RAVINDRAN
Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Tamizhchelvan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :T.N. Sugesh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:G.P. Arivuchudar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2008 passed in A.S.No.27 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District-cum-Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Ranipet, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 10.10.2002 passed in O.S.No.5 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ranipet, Vellore District.

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2008 passed in A.S.No.27 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District-cum-Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Ranipet, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 10.10.2002 passed in O.S.No.5 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ranipet, Vellore District.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. The defendants in O.S.No.5 of 2001 are the appellants in the second appeal.

4. Suit for permanent injunction.

5. The second appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:

    "1. Whether the First Respondent/Plaintiff is entitled to the relief of injunction in respect of a Government Poramboke land restraining its use by the Public?

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top