SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 673

T.RAVINDRAN
Indira Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmana Gounder – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Raghavachari, Advocate.
For the Respondent:D. Baskar for M/s. R. Thamarai Selvan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.40 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Krishnagiri, dated 26.09.2007 in confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.48 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Uthangarai, dated 30.06.2006.

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 26.09.2007 passed in A.S.No.40 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Krishnagiri, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2006 passed in O.S.No.48 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Uthangarai.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the rankings in the trial court.

3. The plaintiff in O.S.No.48 of 2002 is the appellant in this second appeal.

4. Suit for permanent injunction.

5. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that the first item of the suit properties was purchased when she was minor, on her behalf, by her father by way of a sale deed dated 23.09.1993 from Manickam and his legal heir and enjoying the same and to gain access to the first item, the second item of the suit properties was also purchased in the name of the plaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top