S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S. L. K. K. Promotors Represented by its Managing Partner Rajeswari – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Vigilance & Anti Corruption, Chennai City III, Nandanam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Common Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 11 of the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944, pleased to set aside the order of the learned Principal Session Judge dated 09.11.2010 in Crl.M.P.No.1234 of 2009 and by allowing this appeal.
The Order dated 09.11.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1234 of 2009 is under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2. The petition was filed by the appellants before the Principal District Court, Chengalpet with the prayer to raise the attachment over the sum of Rs.48,00,000/- which is absolutely belongs to the appellant/petitioner. The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Department, Kancheepuram filed a counter and the issues were adjudicated. Accordingly, the trial Court has dismissed the petition, against which the present appeal is filed.
3. The contention of the appellant is that the said amount is no way connected with the alleged ill-gotten money and the said amount has been received, consequent to the sale agreement entered with third parties. Thus, the said money cannot be attached at all.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader objected the said contention by stating that huge amount of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.