JUDGMENT :

M.M.Sundresh, J.

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order dated 10.02.2021 made in W.P.(MD)No.23153 of 2018.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order of the learned Single Judge, who vacated the interim order on the premise that the learned Counsel for the appellants was not inclined to argue the matter.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that there was some inconvenience on that date and that is the reason why the instructing Counsel made a request for adjournment.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submitted that the matter has been stalled by way of the interim order, as there is nothing on merits.

4. We are not inclined to go into the merits of the case. However, we find that the learned Single Judge could have considered the request made by the appellants' Counsel by granting a short accommodation. Since specific instruction has been given by the Counsel on record to the Junior Counsel, who represented, not to argue the matter, one could understand the predicament involved. This is a hotly contested case.

5. In such view of the matter, we are incline