SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 726

R.SUBBIAH, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Kalpana – Appellant
Versus
Kumaravel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :A. Subadra, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K. Thirunavukkarasu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed u/s.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2013 passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.341 of 2012 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

1. This matter is heard through Video-Conferencing.

2. For the sake of convenience, appellants herein are referred to as 'claimants' and second respondent herein is referred to as 'Insurance Company'.

3. Not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in and by its judgment and decree dated 28.02.2013 passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.341 of 2012 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, claimants have filed the present appeal.

4. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

    Claimants are parents and sisters of the deceased Tamilarasan. On 09.05.2012 the deceased Tamilarasan was riding pillion in a TVS Star Sport Two Wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-25-AA-9576. At about 12.30 p.m., while the two-wheeler was proceeding on the road opposite to Chengam Bus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top