SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 730

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Mahadevi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Govi Ganesan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K.V. Ravindran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 09.12.2015 passed in IA.No.414 of 2015 in OS.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff Court, Chengam.

The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 09.12.2015 passed in IA.No.415 of 2015 in OS.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff Court, Chengam

1. These civil revision petitions are filed against the fair and decretal order dated 09.12.2015 passed in IA.Nos.414 & 415 of 2015 in OS.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff Court, Chengam thereby allowing the petition to reopen and recall PW1.

2. The petitioner is the first defendant and the first respondent is the plaintiff. The first respondent filed suit for bare injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. When the matter was posted for judgment, the first respondent came forward with the petition to reopen and recall along with the petition to receive additional documents in IA.Nos.414 to 416 of 2015. All the petitions were allowed. The petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top