Mani Ambalam vs District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 741

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, S.KANNAMMAL
Mani Ambalam – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :AR.L. Sundarasen, Senior Counsel for J. Anandkumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: K.P. Narayanakumar, Special Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT :

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 24.09.2008 passed in W.P(MD)No.1702 of 2006.)

1. Since the issue involved in these writ appeals are one and the same, these writ appeals are taken up together and disposed of by means of this common judgment.

2. The unsuccessful writ petitioners are the appellants herein.

S. No	Name	Case No.	Dates of ASO Order	Village	S.No	Extent	Classification
1	R.Maniambalam	W.A(MD)No. 618 /2009	12.02.1996	Kazhanivasal	237	1.87.0 Hec.	Government Dry unoccupied
2	S.Chellakannu	W.A(MD)No. 697/2008	08.01.1996	Kazhanivasal	48	1.50	acres Forest Poramboke
3	S.Chellakannu	W.A(MD)No. 698/2008	08.01.1996	O.Siruvayal	134 /2	3.50 acre	Kuttivayal Kanmoi (Water Course)
4.	S.Chellakannu	W.A(MD)No. 700/2008	08.01.1996	Kazhanivasal	48	1.50 acre	Forest Poramboke
5.	S.Chellakannu	W.A(MD)No. 701/2008	08.01.1996	O.Siruvayal	134 /2	3.50 acre	Kuttivayal Kanmoi(Water Course)
6	Kaspar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 741

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, S.KANNAMMALMani Ambalam – AppellantVersusDistrict Revenue Officer, Sivagangai – Respondent

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, S.KANNAMMAL
Mani Ambalam – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai – Respondent