SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 770

P.N.PRAKASH, V.SIVAGNANAM
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Kanchipuram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :John Sathyan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: K. Prabakar, Addl. Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

P.N. PRAKASH, J.

(Prayer: R.T. No.1 of 2019 Referred Trial under Section 366 Cr.P.C. on the judgment and order dated 15.02.2019 passed in Special Case No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Court, Chengalpattu.

Crl. A. No.31 of 2021 Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 15.02.2019 passed in Special Case No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Court, Chengalpattu.)

1. For the sake of anonymity, the deceased in this case, who is a minor girl, is referred to as “X”.

2. Shorn off unnecessary frills, the germane facts leading to the institution of the referred trial and criminal appeal run thus:

2.1 “X” was 13 years old when her life ebbed out. She was the daughter of Malar (P.W.1) and Munusamy. Apart from “X”, Malar (P.W.1) has a daughter, Divya (P.W.2) and a son Arul Kumar (P.W.3) and both were elder to “X”. Divya (P.W.2) got married to one Velmurugan, through whom, she has a child named Koteeswari, who was around three years old at the time of the incident. All of them were living together under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top