SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 778

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, S.KANNAMMAL
Indumathi Bhaskaran – Appellant
Versus
Rajendran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :G. Karnan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:G. Maruthiah, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 06.06.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.1279 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Court, Thanjavur.)

1. Seeking enhancement of compensation, the appellants/claimants have preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award, dated 06.06.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1279 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Court, Thanjavur.

2. In the said M.C.O.P, the appellants/claimants 1 to 4 are the wife, children and mother of the deceased-Bhaskaran. The Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.1,07,80,804/- on various heads. The said award is now challenged in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal only on the quantum.

3. The brief facts relevant for the consideration of the above case is that on 06.07.2012, when the deceased-Bhaskaran was proceeding in a two-wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-46-C-2563 from Ariyalur Reddypalayam Ultra Tech Cement Company to Thanja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top