SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 782

K.MURALI SHANKAR
V. Umarani – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Vaidyanathan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Senthil Sakaranatha Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M. Kannan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records from the trial Court pertaining to the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai in M.C.No.33 of 2012, dated 18.06.2013 fixing a sum of Rs.2,000/- towards maintenance of the petitioner and enhance the same and fix a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance to the petitioner by allowing this revision.)

1. The Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in M.C.No.33 of 2012, dated 18.06.2013 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Madurai.

2. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the revision petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 09.07.1997, that due to their wed-lock, a male child by name Madhesh was born to them on 13.11.1998 and that subsequently, there arose misunderstanding between them and they are living separately.

3. It is also not in dispute that the respondent has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.169 of 2005 claiming divorce, that the revision petitioner has filed a petition in H.M.O.P. No.90 of 2007 claiming the relief of restitution of conjugal rights, that the Family C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top