SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 796

G.JAYACHANDRAN
B. Yuvasurya(minor) – Appellant
Versus
R. Panneerselvam – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.S. Jothivani, B. Prabhu Sudha, Advocates.
For the Respondents:U. Manogar, P. Chandrasekaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Appeal Suit has been filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code r/w Order 41, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge at Vellore, O.S.No.66 of 2015, dated 10.07.2017.)

(The case has been heard through Video Conferencing)

1. The appellant herein is the third defendant in the suit filed for specific performance. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, the present appeal is filed.

2. Brief facts of the case is that, the plaintiff Panneerselvam entered into an agreement with the 1st defendant Baskaran, his minor sons Yogesh and Yuvasuriya in respect of the suit property for a sale consideration of Rs.11,00,000/-. The first defendant received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards advance and part of the sale price from the plaintiff and acknowledged the receipt of the same. The property belonged to the first defendant and the other two defendants were added as formal parties to the agreement by way of caution by the first defendant. The part of the sale consideration was rece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top