SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4580

P.RAJAMANICKAM
Abdul Mutallib – Appellant
Versus
A. Noorjahan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

P. Rajamanickam, J.

This Appeal has been filed by the complainant against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. III, Salem in C.C. No. 248 of 2003 dated 26.04.2005.

2. The appellant herein has filed a private complaint under section 200 of Cr.P.C, 1973 stating that the accused had borrowed money for constructing her house from the complainant's wife, agreeing to repay the same with interest. He further stated that when his wife demanded the accused to repay the said amount, the accused with a view to discharge the said debt has issued a cheque for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- dated 01.03.2003. As the complainant's wife does not have account in her name, endorsed the said cheque in favour of her husband and requested him to realise the money, hence, the complainant had presented the said cheque in the Bank, for encashment as a holder in due course on 10.03.2003, but the said cheque was returned on 11.03.2003 as funds insufficient. Hence, the complainant has issued a statutory notice on 29.03.2003 calling upon the accused to pay the amount within 15 days from the date of receipt of the said notice. He further stated that though, the accused had received

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top