SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 813

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C. B. Manokaran – Appellant
Versus
P. Valli – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:B. Hari Krishnan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Poornima, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayed to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 24.11.2020 passed by the learned District Munsif, Tiruvotiyur, dismissing I.A.No.2 of 2020 in O.S.No.4 of 2017 and allow I.A.No.2 of 2020 in O.S.No.4 of 2017.)

1. The Revision Petition has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.4 of 2017 now pending on the field of the District Munsif Court, Tiruvotriyur, questioning the order dated 24.11.2020 in I.A.No.2 of 2020.

2. The said application had been filed seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to make local inspection. The said application was dismissed by order dated 24.11.2020. 3. O.S.No.4 of 2017 had been filed by the plaintiff, seeking a judgment and decree against the defendants in the nature of declaration that a Sale Deed dated 10.03.2011 executed by the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants conveying the lands measuring 17.5 cents in S.No.73/48 in Ernavur Village, Tiruvotriyur Taluk, Tiruvallur District, to and in favour of the 4th defendant is non-est, illegal, null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and on the other legal heirs of deceased Chellammal and for permanent injunction res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top