SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 833

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
E. Kumari – Appellant
Versus
K. Haridoss – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :P.T. Salim Fathima, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Shobana, R. Sree Vidhya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2012 made in MACT OP No.2825 of 2011 on the file of the Chief Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Court of Small Causes), Chennai.)

1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 18.12.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in MCOP No.2825 of 2011.

2. The appellants are the claimants and the Legal Representatives of the deceased R.Elumalai Gounder, who died on 12.06.2011 as a result of an accident caused by a vehicle owned by the first respondent and insured with the second respondent.

3. The claimants are the legal representatives and the dependants of the deceased and they are his wife, two sons and his mother. They preferred a claim before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai against the owners of the vehicle as well as the second respondent Insurance Company seeking a compensation of Rs.16,00,000/-.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top