SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 838

TEEKAA RAMAN
New India Assurance Company Limited, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
K. Jayanthi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :J. Chandran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in MCOP.No.1669 of 2013, by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, learned V Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, on 20.07.2015.)

1. The Insurance Company has preferred this appeal against the award dated 20.07.2015 passed by the learned V Judge, [Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal], Small Causes Court, Chennai, in M.C.O.P.No.1669 of 2013, on the ground of liability and quantum.

2. As to the manner of the accident and factum of the accident, when there was sudden crossing of a dog and without involvement of any other vehicle, the Tribunal has held that the accident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the two wheeler.

3. The case of the claim petitioner before the Tribunal is that on 03.01.2012, at about 19 hours, the claim petitioner, as a pillion rider, was travelling in a motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN-19- C- 4478 from Thiruporur to Mahabalipuram. At that time, the driver of the motor cycle was driven the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and came at a dangerous speed, applied sudden break and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top