High Court of Judicature at Madras
Case No : C.M.A. No. 339 of 2016
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Parties : Valli & Another Versus Ramasamy & Another
Date of Judgment : 26-04-2021
Motor Accident - Accident - Funeral expenses - Claimants seeking enhancement of compensation - Appellants/claimants are parents of deceased minor girl died result of an accident caused by a vehicle owned by the first respondent and insured with the second respondent - Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under impugned Award directed second respondent to pay Appellants/claimants a compensation - Deceased is a minor girl who was aged six years old at time of the accident which happened - Appellants have challenged the impugned award on ground Tribunal has not awarded compensation towards loss of love and affection, towards funeral expenses
Finding of the court: Appellants/claimants that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and unjust has to be rejected by Court - Deceased was aged 12 years when accident happened on - Court was not persuaded to enhance compensation from deceased minor aged 12 years for an accident that happened - Court cannot enhance the compensation to a deceased minor
Result: Appeal dismissed
Judgment :-
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree in MCOP.No.720 of 2012 dated 25.08.2014 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Namakkal.)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 25.08.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge, Namakkal) in MCOP.No.720 of 2012.
2. Heard Mr.TS.Arthaneswaran, learned counsel representing Mr.C.Paraneedharan, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr.S.Arun kumar, learned counsel for the second respondent. Since the first respondent was set exparte before the Tribunal, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
3. The Appellants/claimants are the parents of the deceased minor girl Krithika, who died on 24.12.2011 as a result of an accident caused by a vehicle owned by the first respondent and insured with the second respondent. The Appellants/claimants preferred a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking compensation for the death of their daughter Krithika.
4. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the impugned Award directed the second respondent to pay the Appellants/claimants a compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- together with interest and costs as detailed hereunder:
| Heads | Award amount (Rs.) |
| Loss of dependency | 2,25,000/- |
| Non-pecuniary damages | 75,000/- |
| Future Prospects | 75,000/- |
| Total | 3,75,000/- |
5. The Appellants/claimants being unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal have preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.
6. The deceased is a minor girl who was aged six years old at the time of the accident which happened on 24.12.2011. The Appellants have challenged the impugned award on the ground that the Tribunal has not awarded compensation towards loss of love and affection, towards funeral expenses. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its latest decision in the case of Rajendra Singh & Others vs. National Insurance Company Limited & Others reported in CDJ 2020 SC 585, in a case also involving a minor who died as a result of an accident on 25.12.2012 held that the compensation assessed at Rs.2,95,000/- cannot be considered to be unjust and therefore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court was not persuaded to enhance the compensation so fixed. In the case on hand, the accident happened on 24.12.2011 and the deceased minor is aged six years and the Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- which included Rs.2,25,000/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.75,000/- towards non pecuniary damages and another sum of Rs.75,000/- towards Future Prospects and therefore, the contention of the Appellants/claimants that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and unjust has to be rejected by this Court. Even in the case of Rajendra Singh referred to supra, the deceased was aged 12 years when the accident happened on 25.12.2012. When the Hon’ble Supreme Court was not persuaded to enhance the compensation from Rs.2,95,000/- for a deceased minor aged 12 years for an accident that happened on 25.12.2012, this Court cannot enhance the compensation to a deceased minor aged 6 years for an accident that happened in the year 2011 as the compensation fixed by the Tribunal is Rs.3,75,000/-
7. For the foregoing reasons, there is no merit in this Appeal. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall stand dismissed. The Second Respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the entire award amount along with interest and costs as assessed by the Tribunal after deducting the amount already deposited if any to the credit of MCOP.No.720 of 2012 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.