SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 2081

R.THARANI
KAVITHA – Appellant
Versus
RAMAMOORTHY – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for Appearing Parties
Mr.S.Jayakumar, for the Appellant; Mr.N.Rahamadhullah, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

2. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2018 dated 05.11.2019, on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai.

3. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The husband has filed a petition for divorce. In that case, the wife has filed a petition in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2019 to recall P.W.1 and to reopen the trial.

4. Brief substance of the affidavits in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2019 is as follows: The main O.P. Is pending for arguments. The case of the husband is that the husband was working in Singapore and from the date of marriage till 2012, he went to Singapore several times and P.W.1 in his evidence has stated that his passport was with the wife. When the wife searched the house, she found the passport. To mark the passport, the trial has to be reopened and the evidence of P.W.1 has to be recalled.

5. The brief substance of the counter in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2019 is as follows: The wife has admitted that the husband was in Singapore. She has also admitted in H.M.O.P.No.75 of 2017 that the husband was at Singapore and there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top