D.KRISHNA KUMAR
Palaniappan – Appellant
Versus
C. Subramani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aggrieved by the award passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC-1) (M.A.C.T.), Salem in M.C.O.P. No.285/1998 dated 28.06.2002, the claimant has preferred the present appeal.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
On 04.01.1998 at about 7.00 a.m., when the claimant was proceeding near Ramakrishna Park, Hasthampatty police limit, Salem in his TVS 50 Moped bearing Registration No. TN-27-B-7084, the first respondent's motor cycle bearing registration No.TN-27-B-2122 which was driven in a rash and negligent manner, hit the claimant and thereby caused grievous injuries to the claimant. He was admitted in hospital and taken treatment. Hence, the claimant has filed a claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation from the respondents towards permanent disability sustained by the claimant.
3. Before the Tribunal, P.W.1 to P.W.3 were examined and Exs.P1 to P6 were marked on the side of the claimant. R.W.1 to R.W.3 were examined and Exs.R1 to R7 were marked on the side of the respondents. The Tribunal after analysing the oral and documentar
GOVIND YADAV V. THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
K. JANARDHAN V. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS. PRANAY SETHI
NAGAPPA VS. GURDAYAL SINGH & OTHERS (2003 ACJ 12]
Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata [(1976) 1 SCC 289 : 1976 SCC (L&S) 52]
RAMLA AND OTHERS VS. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & OTHERS [2019 (2) SCC 192]
RAJ KUMAR VS. AJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER [(2011) 1 SCC 343]
RESHMA KUMARI & OTHERS VS. MADAN MOHAN AND ANOTHER [2013 (9) SCC 65]
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Narendra Pandu - rang Kadam and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.