SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1030

D.KRISHNA KUMAR
Palaniappan – Appellant
Versus
C. Subramani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.Kuppusamy
For the Respondent: Mrs. Sree Vidhya

JUDGMENT :

Aggrieved by the award passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC-1) (M.A.C.T.), Salem in M.C.O.P. No.285/1998 dated 28.06.2002, the claimant has preferred the present appeal.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

On 04.01.1998 at about 7.00 a.m., when the claimant was proceeding near Ramakrishna Park, Hasthampatty police limit, Salem in his TVS 50 Moped bearing Registration No. TN-27-B-7084, the first respondent's motor cycle bearing registration No.TN-27-B-2122 which was driven in a rash and negligent manner, hit the claimant and thereby caused grievous injuries to the claimant. He was admitted in hospital and taken treatment. Hence, the claimant has filed a claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation from the respondents towards permanent disability sustained by the claimant.

3. Before the Tribunal, P.W.1 to P.W.3 were examined and Exs.P1 to P6 were marked on the side of the claimant. R.W.1 to R.W.3 were examined and Exs.R1 to R7 were marked on the side of the respondents. The Tribunal after analysing the oral and documentar

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top