JUDGMENT :

V.M. VELUMANI, J.

The matter is heard through “Video Conferencing.”

1. This appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted by the award dated 04.01.2002, made in M.C.O.P. No. 313 of 2001, on the file of the II Additional District Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Erode.

2. The appellants-claimants filed M.C.O.P. No. 313 of 2001, on the file of the II Additional District Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Erode, claiming a sum of Rs. 12,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Kannammal, who died in the accident that took place on 11.09.2000.

3. The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by 1st respondent/driver of the Bus belonging to the 2nd respondent and directed the respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 4,41,000/- as compensation to the appellants.

4. Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal to the appellants by the award dated 04.01.2002, made in M.C.O.P. No. 313 of 2001, the appellants have come out with the present appeal.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants contended that at the time of accident, the deceased was an agriculturist-cum-milk vendor and was earning a sum of Rs. 6,000/- to Rs. 7,000/- per month. On 11.09.2000, due to negligence of the 1st respondent, the accident occurred and due to the injuries sustained in the accident, she died in the Hospital, inspite of treatment. The Tribunal without considering the evidence let in by the appellants, erroneously fixed a sum of Rs. 1,125/- per month as notional income of the deceased. The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that minimum income of a person can be arrived at Rs. 3,000/- per month. The appellants have filed Exs.A12 and A13, being the medical bills. The deceased was admitted in KG Hospital, Coimbatore, on 20.09.2000. She has taken treatment as in-patient for a period of 13 days in two different hospitals. Her leg was amputated during treatment. Inspite of treatment, she died on 04.10.2000. The respondents have not let in any evidence to disprove the evidence of the appellants with regard to avocation, income and medical expenses for treatment of the deceased. The Tribunal erroneously fixed meagre amounts and without giving any reason, reduced the medical bills claimed by the appellant and prayed for enhancement of the compensation.

6. Per contra, Mrs. I. Malar, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent-Insurance Company contended that the appellants failed to prove the avocation and income of the deceased. The Tribunal, in the absence of any material evidence with regard to avocation and income, fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 1,125/- per month. The accident is of the year 2000. The notional income fixed by the Tribunal is not meagre. The Tribunal considering Exs.A12 and A13, medical bills, rejected some of the bills and granted Rs. 2,40,000/- which is correct. The appellants are not entitled for any enhancement and prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

7. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the 3rd respondent-Insurance Company and perused the materials available on record.

8. From the materials on record, it is seen that the appellants have contended that the deceased was doing Agriculture cattle farm and milk vending business and was earning a sum of Rs. 6,000/- per month. The appellant failed to substantiate the avocation and income of the deceased by letting in any acceptable evidence. In the absence of any evidence with regard to avocation and income, the Tribunal fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 45/- per day and deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses. The accident is of the year 2000. The notional income fixed by the Tribunal is meagre. Considering the materials on record in its entirety, a sum of Rs. 2,500/- is fixed as notional inco