IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
M/s. Sun Global Logistics Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. Nos. 7937, 7938 & 8248 of 2013 and M.P. No. 1 of 2013 & W.M.P. Nos. 6359 & 6360 of 2017
Decided On : 02-06-2021
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 7(aa) and 157 - Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 5(2), 5(3) and 6(o) -Payment of arrears of cost recover charges - communication - Challenged - Power to levy and collect Cost Recovery Charges from a Customs Cargo Service Provider - Exemption - Customs Department - Impugned communication the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,24,23,213/- as arrears of amount payable towards Cost Recovery Charges (CRC) from date of issue of Container Freight Licence issued to the petitioner till 31.3.2013 - A dispute has arisen due to implementation of VI Pay Commission as a result of which salaries of Central Government Employees were increased drastically - Held, Power to grant such waiver/exemption has been exercised right from 1997 through circular and practice has been continued by issuing circulars by Central Board of Excise and Customs even after the above Regulation came into force - While disposing these writ petitions in favour of petitioner by directing the respondents to regularize payments already made by petitioner and by directing the respondents to grant waiver to petitioner for period after petitioner has achieved the required benchmark/criteria as per CBEC Circular - Court direct jurisdictional Commissioner/Chief Commissioner to regularize case of petitioner by granting waiver/exemption to the petitioner by an order with effect from the date on which petitioner achieved benchmark as per the CBEC Circular - Writ petition disposed
ORDER :
By this common order, all the three writ petitions have being disposed.
2. In W.P.No.7937 of 2013, the petitioner has challenged the impugned communication dated 11.2.2013 of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Appraising Docks-Admin).
3. By the impugned communication dated 11.2.2013 the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,24,23,213/- as arrears of amount payable towards Cost Recovery Charges (CRC) from the date of issue of Container Freight Licence issued to the petitioner till 31.3.2013.
4. The aforesaid demand in the impugned communication dated 11.2.2013 is the net of the gross demand of Rs.1,64,25,173/- after adjusting a sum of Rs.40,01,960/- paid by the petitioner.
5. In W.P.No.7938 of 2013, paragraph 2.10 from The Customs Manual dated 2.2.2012 has been challenged in so far as its seeks to impose the payment of arrears of cost recover charges as a condition precedent for waiver from cost recovery charges. Relevant portion from the Customs Manual impugned in the said writ petition reads as under:-
| (i) | No of container handled by ICD | 7200 TEUs per annum |
| (ii) | No of containers handled by CFS | 1200 TEUs per annum |
| (iii) | No of B/E process by ICDs/CFSs | 7200 per annum for ICDs and 1204 CFS |
| (iv) | Benchmark at (i) to (iii) shall be reduced by 50% for these ICSs/CFSs exclusively dealing with exports as per staffing norms |
|
6. In W.P.No.8248 of 2011, the petitioner has challenged the instruction of the Central Board Excise and Customs dated 12.9.2005 bearing reference F No. 434/17/2004-Cus-iV in so far as it stipulates that waiver of Cost Recovery Charges (CRC) would be only prospective with no claim for the past.
7. A dispute has arisen due to the implementation of the VI Pay Commission as a result of which the salaries of the Central Government Employees were increased drastically. Since officers of the Customs Department were deployed in the Container Freight Station(CFS) of the petitioner on Cost Recovery Charge (CRC) basis, the petitioner was called upon to pay a sum of Rs.5,86,428/- [Rs.97,738 x 6] as the differential Cost Recovery Charges payable to the respondent on or before 31.12.2008 for the period between July 2008 to December 2008 by a communication dated 17.12.2008.
8. Apart from the above the petitioner was also called upon to pay a sum of Rs.2,60,275/- in advance towards monthly Cost Recovery Charges for the period commencing from January 2009 onwards.
9. The above amounts were demanded from the for deploying officers on CRC basis in its CFS as detailed below:-
| S. No. | Designation of the Officers deployed in the Petitioners | Old Amount per month | Area CRS of pursuant to implementation of VI Pay Commission | Rate |
| 1. | Appraiser | 50,345/- | 30,239/- | 80,583/- |
| 2. | Examiner | 43,401/- | 25,639/- | 69,040/- |
| 3. | Preventive Officer | 43,401/- | 25,639/- | 69,040/- |
| 4. | Tax Asst. | 25,390/- | 16,222/- | 41,612/- |
10. According to the petitioner it was entitled to refund the amounts already paid during the period and was entitled for a waiver.
11. Under these
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.