SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1147

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
M. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
A. Kabali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. T.G. Balachandran.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.B. Gopalan.

JUDGMENT :

(This case has been heard through video conference)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in the award dated 06.10.2012 in MCOP.No.1482 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, XVII Additional Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

2. The case in brief is as follows:

On 28.02.2008 at 10.30 hours, while the claimant was walking at Kelambakkam to Vandaloor road, a Crane bearing registration No.TN-22-AY-3110 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner from behind took a left turn in order to avoid collision with a vehicle coming in the opposite direction and in that process hit the claimant, as a result of which, he sustained grievous injuries on his right leg. Immediately, he was taken to Stanely Government Hospital for treatment. The first respondent remained ex-parte before the Tribunal.

3. The second respondent/Insurance Company had disputed the claim of the claimant and filed the counter statement. After due enquiry, on assessment of the evidence before the Trib

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top